How a global clinical research leader saved $2M in revenue with test automation

Application type: WebLife Sciences & Clinical Research

Brief

A global clinical research organization with more than 35 years in the industry partnered with Sedstart to fix document upload bottlenecks that were slowing R&D workflows and putting revenue at risk. We load-tested 20 modules under real-world concurrency, automated 100+ functional test cases on a legacy technology stack, and delivered timestamped, audit-ready results. Together, this prevented an estimated USD 2M in revenue loss with zero additional headcount.

Client background

With more than 35 years of experience in clinical research, our client is a trusted partner to organizations running complex, highly regulated R&D programs worldwide.

Its platforms support R&D workflows both inside the organization and across client environments. Document handling is central to that work. Large volumes of documents, many of them large files, move through the system as studies progress, so performance directly affects how quickly research moves forward.

Because the organization operates in a heavily regulated space, every part of its software has to hold up under two kinds of pressure. It must perform reliably for users, and it must produce traceable evidence for internal and external regulatory inspections. The client needed a way to find performance risks early and validate functionality at scale without adding to the team.

The challenge

The client had deep domain expertise and an established platform, but several problems were limiting its ability to ship with confidence.

Document upload bottlenecks

The volume and size of documents moving through the platform were choking R&D workflows across the organization and its client environments. Upload performance had never been measured, and it degraded under load.

Slow multi-role validation

The platform serves many user roles, each working with different datasets. Validating functionality across every combination was done manually. That consumed a large amount of QA time and effort and slowed down every cycle.

Legacy technology stack

The platform ran on an older technology stack. Standard test automation tools could not be applied to it out of the box, so automation had long been considered infeasible.

Audit and compliance pressure

Test results had to be traceable and timestamped so they could be used in internal and external regulatory inspections. Existing compliance evidence was ad hoc and hard to trace. That left the team exposed every time an audit came around.

Revenue and headcount at stake

With performance issues unresolved, roughly USD 2M in revenue was at risk. The obvious fix was to expand the team, but that meant new hires, more cost, and more time before any improvement showed up.

Our approach

Concurrency testing → Evidence → Remediation

Sedstart combined performance testing, functional test automation, and hands-on QA consulting in a single engagement. The goal was to surface the real bottlenecks, prove them with evidence, and help the client fix the product quickly without growing the team. Here's how the engagement unfolded:

Concurrency testing across 20 modules

We ran concurrency (load) testing across 20 modules of the platform. We applied varied loads based on the client's actual requirements, not generic benchmarks, so results reflected how the system behaves in real use.

Bottlenecks pinpointed with documented evidence

Instead of vague "the system is slow" findings, we pinpointed specific performance bottlenecks. Each was reported with clear, documented evidence, which gave the development team exact targets for remediation.

Customized, easy-to-read performance reports

Performance data is only useful if people can act on it. We delivered a customized report that made the results simple to read and interpret for technical and non-technical stakeholders alike.

100+ functional test cases automated

To replace slow manual validation across user roles and datasets, we automated more than 100 functional test cases covering the client's existing workflows. Every run produces timestamped results.

Custom automation built for the legacy stack

Standard tools couldn't handle the client's legacy technology, so we built custom automation features to fit it. This made automation possible on a stack that had previously been ruled out.

QA consulting to fix the product fast

Alongside the testing, our QA consultants worked with the client's team to prioritize and resolve the issues we found. The existing team handled everything, with zero additional headcount.

Before vs after

Metric Before Sedstart After Sedstart
Document upload performance Unmeasured, degrading under load Bottlenecks identified with evidence
Functional validation Manual and slow across roles 100+ automated, timestamped cases
Performance reporting Complex or not available Customized, easy-to-read reports
Legacy-stack automation Not feasible with standard tools Custom-built automation features
Compliance evidence Ad hoc, hard to trace Timestamped and audit-ready
Team and cost impac Expansion needed, ~USD 2M at risk Zero new hires, USD 2M loss prevented

The result

  • USD 2M revenue loss prevented: Critical performance bottlenecks were found and addressed before they could reach production and disrupt R&D workflows.

  • Audit-ready compliance: More than 100 timestamped functional test results can now be used directly in internal and external regulatory inspections, replacing ad hoc evidence with a traceable record.

  • Performance risk caught early: Concurrency testing across 20 modules under realistic loads gave the team a clear picture of how the platform behaves under pressure, backed by evidence it can act on.

  • Automation on legacy technology Custom-built automation features brought reliable test coverage to a stack that standard tools couldn't support.

  • Zero added headcount: Full performance and functional coverage came from the existing team, with no expansion and no new hires.

Protection, not just performance testing

This engagement shows that organizations in regulated industries don't need to grow their teams or rebuild their technology to get enterprise-grade QA. By combining concurrency testing, custom automation for a legacy stack, and focused QA consulting, Sedstart helped the client protect USD 2M in revenue, automate 100+ functional test cases, and make its QA process audit-ready, all with the team it already had.

For pharmaceutical companies, life sciences and clinical research organizations, where performance and compliance carry equal weight, Sedstart provides the evidence, automation, and expertise needed to ship reliable software and walk into every inspection prepared.

$2M

Revenue loss prevented

20

Modules load-tested

100+

Functional test cases automated